Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

BACKGROUND: During a stimulated cycle of in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI), women receive daily doses of gonadotropin follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to induce multifollicular development in the ovaries. A normal response to stimulation (e.g. retrieval of 5 to 15 oocytes) is considered desirable. Generally, the number of eggs retrieved is associated with the dose of FSH. Both hyper-response and poor response are associated with an increased chance of cycle cancellation. In hyper-response, this is due to increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), while poor response cycles are cancelled because the quantity and quality of oocytes is expected to be low. Clinicians often individualise the FSH dose using patient characteristics predictive of ovarian response. Traditionally, this meant women's age, but increasingly, clinicians use various ovarian reserve tests (ORTs). These include basal FSH (bFSH), antral follicle count (AFC), and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). It is unclear whether individualising FSH dose improves clinical outcomes. This review updates the 2018 version. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registers in February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared (a) different doses of FSH in women with a defined ORT profile (i.e. predicted low, normal, or high responders based on AMH, AFC, and/or bFSH) or (b) an individualised dosing strategy (based on at least one ORT measure) versus uniform dosing or a different individualised dosing algorithm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Primary outcomes were live birth/ongoing pregnancy and severe OHSS. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 studies, involving 8520 women (6 new studies added to 20 studies included in the previous version). We treated RCTs with multiple comparisons as separate trials for the purpose of this review. Meta-analysis was limited due to clinical heterogeneity. Evidence certainty ranged from very low to low, with the main limitations being imprecision and risk of bias associated with lack of blinding. Direct dose comparisons according to predicted response in women Due to differences in dose comparisons, caution is required when interpreting the RCTs in predicted low responders. All evidence was low or very low certainty. Effect estimates were very imprecise, and increased FSH dosing may or may not have an impact on rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy, OHSS, and clinical pregnancy. Similarly, in predicted normal responders (10 studies, 4 comparisons), higher doses may or may not impact the probability of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (e.g. 200 versus 100 international units (IU): odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.36; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 522 women) or clinical pregnancy. Results were imprecise, and a small benefit or harm remains possible. There were too few events for the OHSS outcome to enable inferences. In predicted high responders, lower doses may or may not affect live birth/ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.46; 1 study, 521 women), severe OHSS, and clinical pregnancy. It is also unclear whether lower doses reduce moderate or severe OHSS (Peto OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.80 to 6.67; 1 study, 521 participants). ORT-algorithm studies Eight trials compared an ORT-based algorithm to a non-ORT control group. It is unclear whether live birth/ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy are increased using an ORT-based algorithm (live birth/ongoing pregnancy: OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29; I2 = 30%; 7 studies, 4400 women; clinical pregnancy: OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.18; I2 = 18%; 7 studies, 4400 women; low-certainty evidence). However, ORT algorithms may reduce moderate or severe OHSS (Peto OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.84; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 4400 women; low-certainty evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of severe OHSS (Peto OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.28; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 2724 women; low-certainty evidence). Our findings suggest that if the chance of live birth with a standard starting dose is 25%, the chance with ORT-based dosing would be between 25% and 31%. If the chance of moderate or severe OHSS with a standard starting dose is 5%, the chance with ORT-based dosing would be between 2% and 5%. These results should be treated cautiously due to heterogeneity in the algorithms: some algorithms appear to be more effective than others. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not find that tailoring the FSH dose in any particular ORT population (low, normal, high ORT) affected live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates, but we could not rule out differences, due to sample size limitations. Low-certainty evidence suggests that it is unclear if ORT-based individualisation leads to an increase in live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates compared to a policy of giving all women 150 IU. The confidence interval is consistent with an increase of up to around six percentage points with ORT-based dosing (e.g. from 25% to 31%) or a very small decrease (< 1%). A difference of this magnitude could be important to many women. It is unclear if this is driven by improved outcomes in a particular subgroup. Further, ORT algorithms reduced the incidence of OHSS compared to standard dosing of 150 IU. However, the size of the effect is also unclear. The included studies were heterogeneous in design, which limited the interpretation of pooled estimates. It is likely that different ORT algorithms differ in their effectiveness. Current evidence does not provide a clear justification for adjusting the dose of 150 IU in poor or normal responders, especially as increased dose is associated with greater total FSH dose and cost. It is unclear whether a decreased dose in predicted high responders reduces OHSS, although this would appear to be the most likely explanation for the results.

EGR1 Promotes Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Through Upregulation of SOX9 Expression.

Angiogenesis is strongly associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) progression. Early growth response protein 1 (EGR1) plays an important role in angiogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the function and mechanism of EGR1 involved in OHSS progression. RNA-sequencing was used to identify differentially expressed genes. In vitro OHSS cell model was induced by treating KGN cells with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). In vivo OHSS model was established in mice. The expression levels of EGR1, SOX1, and VEGF were determined by Quantitative Real-Time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), Western blot, immunofluorescence staining, and immunochemistry assay. The content of VEGF in the culture medium of human granulosa-like tumor cell line (KGN) cells was accessed by the ELISA assay. The regulatory effect of EGR1 on SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) was addressed by luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation. The ERG1 and SOX9 levels were significantly upregulated in granulosa cells from OHSS patients and there was a positive association between EGR1 and SOX9 expression. In the ovarian tissues of OHSS mice, the levels of EGR1 and SOX9 were also remarkedly increased. Treatment with hCG elevated the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), EGR1, and SOX9 in KGN cells. Silencing of EGR1 reversed the promoting effect of hCG on VEGF and SOX9 expression in KGN cells. EGR1 transcriptionally regulated SOX9 expression through binding to its promoter. In addition, administration of dopamine decreased hCG-induced VEGF in KGN cells and ameliorated the progression of OHSS in mice, which were companied with decreased EGR1 and SOX9 expression. EGR1 has a promoting effect on OHSS progression and dopamine protects against OHSS through suppression of EGR1/SOX9 cascade. Our findings may provide new targets for the treatment of OHSS.

Long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in fertility preservation cycles before chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Oocytes/embryo cryopreservation and ovarian function suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (GnRHas) are two established strategies for preserving fertility in patients with cancer, frequently both being offered to the same woman. As the first injection of GnRHa should be administered before chemotherapy, it is usually performed in the luteal phase of the urgent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle. The GnRHa flare-up effect on recently stimulated ovaries may cause ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and this risk may discourage some oncologists to offer an ovarian function preservation method with proven efficacy. We suggest the long-acting GnRHa as an option to trigger ovulation for egg retrieval in oncological patients, whenever ovarian suppression during chemotherapy is planned. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from all consecutive ovarian stimulation cases in oncological patients for oocyte cryopreservation from 2016 to 2021 in a single academic referral center. The COS was performed according to good clinical practice standards. Since 2020 long-acting GnRHa trigger was offered to all patients for whom ovarian suppression after cryopreservation was planned. All other patients served as controls, stratified for the triggering method used: highly purified chorionic gonadotrophin 10 000 UI or short-acting GnRHa 0.2 mg. RESULTS: Mature oocytes were collected, with the expected maturation rate, in all the 22 cycles triggered with GnRHa. The mean number of cryopreserved oocytes was 11.1 ± 4, with a maturation rate of 80% (57%-100%), versus 8.8 ± 5.8, 74% (33%-100%) with highly purified chorionic gonadotrophin and 14 ± 8.4, 80% (44%-100%) with short-acting GnRHa. No case of OHSS was observed after long-acting GnRHa triggering and by 5 days after egg retrieval most patients had reached luteinizing hormone levels showing suppression. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data show that long-acting GnRHa is efficacious in inducing the final oocytes' maturation, reducing OHSS risk and suppressing ovarian function by the start of chemotherapy.

Does cabergoline administration affect endometrial VEGFR-2 expression in a rat model of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of cabergoline on endometrial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) immunoexpression in an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one immature female Wistar rats were assigned into three groups: group 1, the control group; group 2, stimulated with gonadotropins to mimic OHSS; and group 3, in which an OHSS protocol was induced and thereafter treated with cabergoline (100 µg/kg/day). Body weight, ovarian volume, corpora lutea numbers, and endometrial VEGFR-2 expression were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Weight gain and ovarian volume were highest in the OHSS-placebo group, while cabergoline administration significantly reversed those effects (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). VEGFR-2 stained cells were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (p = 0.002). Although VEGFR-2 expression was lowest in group 3, the difference was not statistically significant. Corpora lutea numbers were also similar (p = 0.465). CONCLUSION: While successful implantation requires a vascularized receptive endometrium, impaired expression of VEGFR-2 and disrupted endometrial angiogenesis due to cabergoline administration may be associated with IVF failure in fresh OHSS cycles. The insignificant decrease in endometrial VEGFR-2 expression observed in this research needs to be investigated by further studies involving additional techniques such as immunoblotting and/or RT-PCR analyses.

Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of 3 different ovarian stimulation protocols on surrogate biomarkers of coagulation. DESIGN: Observational multicenter cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted in assisted reproductive technology (ART) units. PATIENTS: Infertile women undergoing ART in 2017-2019 were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Our primary outcome was the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram. The ETP was measured at baseline (T1), on the day of ovulation triggering (T2), and 7 days after triggering (T3). Three protocols were prescribed according to the standards used and without hormonal before treatment: agonist protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger (ag-hCG), antagonist protocol with hCG trigger (atg-hCG), or GnRH agonist trigger. The evolution of ETP was compared among groups using a mixed-effects linear regression model. RESULT(S): Sixty-four women with a mean age of 37.8 years participated in the study: of which 24, 16, 24 received ag-hCG, atg-hCG, and GnRH agonist triggers, respectively. As expected, the mean serum estradiol levels in GnRH agonist trigger were statistically higher at T2 and lower at T3 than that for both ag-hCG and atg-hCG. Overall, the ETP evolution over time was statistically different between the groups. Values were similar between groups at T1 and increased at T2 in each group. The greatest difference occurred between T2 and T3 in each group. The ETP continued to increase at T3 in ag-hCG (+110 nM/L × min) and atg-hCG (+171 nM/L × min), but it remained stable in GnRH agonist trigger (-2 nM/L × min). Sex hormone-binding globulin showed persistent increase at T3 despite the fall in estradiol levels, particularly in the GnRH agonist trigger group. CONCLUSION(S): The ag-hCG and atg-hCG groups were associated with a higher hypercoagulable state at T3 than the GnRH agonist trigger group. However, our results show the persistence of a hypercoagulable state after the GnRH agonist triggering despite a sharp drop in estradiol levels. These findings may support the use of GnRH agonist trigger protocol in patients with high thrombotic risk and gives new insight into the fact that coagulation parameters could be disturbed for long time periods. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04188444.

Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome after GnRH Agonist Triggering and Freeze-All Protocol? Never Not, Hardly Ever: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a severe complication associated with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) triggering is considered an efficient strategy to prevent OHSS in the high-risk patient. METHODS: We performed a review of 11 cases of early and severe OHSS following GnRH-a triggering and freeze-all protocol. Electronic databases were searched from inception of each database until October 2021, to identify case reports and case series that reported OHSS after GnRH-a triggering and freeze-all approach describing patient demographics, COS protocol, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: From the literature review, it is possible to suggest that (1) following GnRH-a triggering, the risk of early and severe OHSS is not totally cancelled; (2) despite it is not possible to predict the event, polycystic ovary syndrome is the most common risk factor; (3) the use of GnRH antagonist starting from the day of PU may represent a valid strategy for preventing OHSS in women with high-risk profile; (4) following the unexpected onset of OHSS, measuring serum levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is helpful to exclude an inadvertent exogenous administration or a pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The statement that OHSS risk is eliminated when GnRH-a triggering, a freeze-all strategy, and no hCG in the luteal phase may generate the idea that this event cannot occur. Although rare, these cases have been observed in a relatively short period of time.

Follicular-Phase GnRH Agonist Protocol Is Another Choice for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients With Lower LH/FSH and Lower AMH Levels Without Increasing Severe OHSS Risk.

Purpose: To explore another choice for a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol that does not increase severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk among polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients with specific clinical features. Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Two hundred and fifty-nine participants were divided into two groups, group 1 (fixed GnRH antagonist protocol, n = 295) and group 2 (follicular-phase GnRH agonist protocol, n = 69) according to COS protocols. The basic characteristics and laboratory indicators between these two groups were compared. The severe OHSS rate and clinical pregnancy rate were selected as indicators to evaluate the risks and benefits of the two COS protocols. Subgroup analyses for the severe OHSS rate and clinical pregnancy rate were performed based on baseline luteinizing hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone (bLH/FSH) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels. Results: The severe OHSS rate was statistically higher in group 2 than in group 1 (11.6% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.008), but the biochemical pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate showed no statistical difference between the groups (71.9% vs. 60.3% and 62.5% vs. 54.3%). In the higher bLH/FSH subgroup (≥1.33) and the higher serum AMH level subgroup (>3.4 ng/ml), severe OHSS incidence was statistically higher in group 2 compared to group 1, but this incidence was lower in the bLH/FSH subgroup (<1.33) and the subgroup with lower serum AMH levels (≤3.4 ng/ml); a difference in severe OHSS risk was not observed. There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding clinical pregnancy rate in any subgroup. Conclusion: The limited evidence from this study indicates that in PCOS patients with lower bLH/FSH levels (<1.33) and lower serum AMH levels (≤3.4 ng/ml), a follicular-phase GnRH agonist protocol may be another choice that does not increase the risk of severe OHSS.

Analysis and prediction of risk factors of ovarian hyperstimulation caused by Long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in follicular phase.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the risk factors of ovarian hyperstimulation in patients undergoing long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol in follicular phase of ovulation induction therapy and to establish a predictive model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1289 patients who received Long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in follicular phase for ovulation induction in the Fujian Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital from July 1, 2018, to July 31, 2019, were selected. Among them, 33 patients developed moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The relevant indicators of the two groups were followed up for comparison, and Lasso regression was used to screen independent risk factors and construct a nomogram prediction model.  A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the prediction model. RESULTS: Univariate analysis suggested that the woman's age, basal antral follicle number (AFC), total gonadotropin (Gn) dose, Gn starting dose, basal estradiol (E2) level, basal anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) value, number of follicles obtained, Gn start day E2, the difference in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) value and Gn starting day were statistically significant. Significant indicators of univariate analysis and clinical significance were included in the Lasso regression model, and AFC, woman's age, polycystic ovary syndrome, Gn starting dose and number of follicles obtained were finally screened as final predictors. The ROC curve indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.812. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian hyperstimulation caused by long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in follicular phase for ovulation stimulation has a certain predictability. Paying attention to the patient's age, AFC, Gn starting dose, number of follicles obtained, and whether PCOS is evident may lead to early detection of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which has clinical guiding significance.

Effect of GnRH agonist alone or combined with different low-dose hCG on cumulative live birth rate for high responders in GnRH antagonist cycles: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence regarding the impact of dual trigger on oocyte maturity and reproductive outcomes in high responders. Thus, we aimed to explore the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger alone or combined with different low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) regimens on rates of oocyte maturation and cumulative live birth in high responders who underwent a freeze-all strategy in GnRH antagonist cycles. METHODS: A total of 1343 cycles were divided into three groups according to different trigger protocols: group A received GnRHa 0.2 mg (n = 577), group B received GnRHa 0.2 mg and hCG 1000 IU (n = 403), and group C received GnRHa 0.2 mg and hCG 2000 IU (n = 363). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, and rates of oocyte maturation, fertilization, available embryo, and top-quality embryo among the groups. However, the incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was significantly different among the three groups (0% in group A, 1.49% in group B, and 1.38% in group C). For the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle, there were no significant differences in the number of transferred embryos and rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and early miscarriage among the three groups. Additionally, the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate were not significantly different among the three groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in gestational age, birth weight, birth height, and the proportion of low birth weight among subgroups stratified by singleton or twin. CONCLUSIONS: GnRHa trigger combined with low-dose hCG (1000 IU or 2000 IU) did not improve oocyte maturity and embryo quality and was still associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe OHSS. Therefore, for high responders treated with the freeze-all strategy, the single GnRHa trigger is recommended for final oocyte maturation, which can prevent the occurrence of moderate to severe OHSS and obtain satisfactory pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in subsequent FET cycles.

Nintedanib Treatment After Ovulation is an Effective Therapeutic Strategy for the Alleviation of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) in a Mouse Model.

PURPOSE: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. In this study, we hope to explore whether nintedanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can inhibit OHSS by blocking signaling of vascular endothelial growth factor in a mouse model. Considering that nintedanib been approved for the treatment of some diseases. We believe that nintedanib has important potential in the treatment of OHSS. METHODS: Female ICR mice aged 6-8 weeks with similar initial weights were used to establish the OHSS model. At 12 and 24 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger, we administered nintedanib by subcutaneous injection and analyzed the OHSS-related physiological characteristics and biochemical indices of the model mice within 48 hours after hCG-trigger. RESULTS: Nintedanib significantly alleviated the symptoms of OHSS after hCG-trigger compared with those of OHSS group (weight change, P < 0.0001; ovarian weight, P < 0.0001, peritoneal exudation level, P < 0.01). Further investigation proved that the corpus luteum (number, P < 0.001; diameter, P < 0.0001) and luteal vessel (P < 0.0001) development were inhibited in the nintedanib administration group. Then, the vascular permeability test showed that the capillary bleeding points (P < 0.0001) were also significantly reduced in nintedanib administration group. Gene expression tests demonstrated that the intercellular connection-related genes expression in the nintedanib administration group was similar to that in the no-OHSS induced group. Further detection of coagulation and thrombosis indices indicated that the nintedanib administration in the OHSS model did not increase the risk of thrombosis or bleeding. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that nintedanib can alleviate and manage the symptoms of OHSS in a mouse model. These findings identify a feasible scheme for the prevention and treatment of OHSS in clinical practice in the future. Moreover, since the scheme can be implemented after ovulation, it will not cause potential adverse effects on gametogenesis, fertilization or embryonic development.

Prospective multicenter non-interventional real-world study to assess the patterns of use, effectiveness and safety of follitropin delta in routine clinical practice (the PROFILE study).

Objective: To observe the real-world utilization patterns, effectiveness and safety profile of follitropin delta in women ≥18 years naïve to ovarian stimulation undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Design: Prospective, multinational, multicenter, observational study. All IVF/ICSI treatment protocols were conducted according to routine clinical practice, including undertaking fresh/frozen transfers. Outcomes included use of dosing algorithm, follitropin delta dosing patterns, ovarian response, pregnancy rates and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Results: The first ovarian stimulation cycle using follitropin delta was initiated in 944 women. Mean baseline demographics were: age, 33.5 ± 4.7 years; bodyweight, 67.1 ± 13.6 kg; anti-Müllerian hormone, 20.3 ± 16.1 pmol/L (2.84 ± 2.25 ng/mL). The dosing algorithm was used to calculate the follitropin delta daily starting dose in 893/944 women (94.5%). The mean difference between the calculated and prescribed daily dose was small (0.2 ± 1.40 µg). The mean daily starting follitropin delta dose was 10.4 ± 2.72 µg and the mean total dose administered was 104 µg. Follitropin delta dose adjustments were reported for 57/944 (6.0%) women. The mean number of retrieved oocytes was 10.1 ± 7.03. Ongoing pregnancy at 10-11 weeks was reported for 255 women (27.0% per initiated cycle and 43.1% per fresh transfer [n=592]). Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after fresh and/or frozen transfer was 36.4% (344/944). Four women discontinued follitropin delta due to ADRs. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was the most frequently reported ADR (n=37 [3.9%]); most cases of OHSS were of mild or moderate intensity (n=30 [3.2%]). Conclusions: This large real-world study of follitropin delta utilization patterns confirms its good pregnancy rates while minimizing OHSS risk during first ovarian stimulation cycle.

Impact of an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a patient with breast cancer who received a sustained-release gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist: A case report.

Postoperative hormone therapy for hormone-sensitive patients with breast cancer is important to prevent a recurrence. As hormone therapy does not induce infertility in patients, fertility-preserving therapy is not provided during treatment. Here, however, we performed controlled ovarian stimulation and embryo freezing for fertility preservation under the influence of a sustained-release gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in a patient with breast cancer whose postoperative treatment plan was changed from hormone therapy to chemotherapy. After oocyte retrieval, the patient developed treatment-resistant severe symptomatic ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Following treatment with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, her symptoms immediately improved, and she could receive chemotherapy on schedule.

Two cases of polycystic ovary syndrome with onset of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following controlled ovarian stimulation with aromatase inhibitors for fertility preservation before breast cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) involve high estrogen (E2) levels. We report two breast cancer patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome who underwent fertility preservation and had severe OHSS; their E2 levels were lowered using aromatase inhibitors (AI). CASE REPORTS: A 36-year-old woman underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with AI and cryopreserved 10 blastocysts. She was hospitalized with OHSS (E2 = 139.1 pg/mL). She improved with infusion alone. A 31-year-old woman underwent COS with AI and cryopreserved 8 blastocysts. She was hospitalized for OHSS (E2: 429 pg/mL). Her vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were high (62 pg/mL) at 8 days after the procedure. She needed hospitalization for 9 days. The planned adjuvant therapy was delayed for a week in both cases. CONCLUSION: Elevated VEGF levels should be considered as a risk factor of OHSS even if E2 levels are low with AI treatment.

A rare presentation of endogenous human chorionic gonadotrophin associated severe ovarian hyperstimulation in the second trimester: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is usually an iatrogenic and potentially life-threatening disease. It develops following ovulation induction and use of in vitro fertilization techniques. A 32-year-old primigravida Ethiopian woman presented at 15 weeks gestation with a history of progressive bilateral leg swelling and abdominal pain of 2 weeks duration. She had triplet pregnancy and conceived through in vitro fertilization. She was managed in intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Patients with multiple pregnancy following in vitro fertilization conception can have ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome as late as 15 weeks gestation. Hence, frequent follow-up should be continued to detect early signs of OHSS to avoid further complications and need of intensive care unit care.

Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007-2017).

BACKGROUND: Individualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted during COS to avoid hyper- or hypo-ovarian response, but limited data are currently available to characterize such adjustments. This review describes the frequency and direction (increase/decrease) of recombinant-human FSH (r-hFSH) dose adjustment reported in clinical trials. METHODS: We evaluated the proportion of patients undergoing ART treatment who received ≥ 1 r-hFSH dose adjustments. The inclusion criteria included studies (published Sept 2007 to Sept 2017) in women receiving ART treatment that allowed dose adjustment within the study protocol and that reported ≥ 1 dose adjustments of r-hFSH; studies not allowing/reporting dose adjustment were excluded. Data on study design, dose adjustment and patient characteristics were extracted. Point-incidence estimates were calculated per study and overall based on pooled number of cycles with dose adjustment across studies. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidence where adjustment occurred in < 10% of patients; otherwise, a normal approximation method was used. RESULTS: Initially, 1409 publications were identified, of which 318 were excluded during initial screening and 1073 were excluded after full text review for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies (6630 cycles) reported dose adjustment: 5/18 studies (1359 cycles) reported data for an unspecified dose adjustment (direction not defined), in 10/18 studies (3952 cycles) dose increases were reported, and in 11/18 studies (5123 cycles) dose decreases were reported. The studies were performed in women with poor, normal and high response, with one study reporting in oocyte donors and one in obese women. The median day that dose adjustment was permitted was Day 6 after the start of treatment. The point estimates for incidence (95% CI) for unspecified dose adjustment, dose increases, and dose decreases were 45.3% (42.7, 48.0), 19.2% (18.0, 20.5), and 9.5% (8.7, 10.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights that, in studies in which dose adjustment was allowed and reported, the estimated incidence of r-hFSH dose adjustments during ovarian stimulation was up to 45%.

Does the additional use of clomiphene citrate or letrozole for in vitro fertilization deserve more attention?

BACKGROUND: Adding clomiphene citrate (CC) and/or letrozole (LE) to in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles for mild ovarian stimulation is a general approach. Although lots of researches have demonstrated partial benefits of the strategy, all-around effects of oral medications remained deficient. This paper aims to assess whether an addition of oral medication will result in considerable outcomes on T-Gn (total dose of gonadotropin), Gn days, total retrieved ova, high quality embryos, blastocyst number, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative pregnancy rate, even if it was not conventional mild/minimal stimulations. RESULTS: Participants were categorized to three diverse populations as high responders, normal responders and poor responders according to basal antral follicle count. T-Gn in patients treated with CC/LE distinctly decreased from 2496.96 IU/d to 1827.68 IU/d, from 2860.28 IU/d to 2119.99 IU/d, and from 3182.15 IU/d to 1802.84 IU/d, respectively. For high ovary responders and normal responders, the OHSS incidence rate also declined from 29.2 to 4.3% (P < 0.001) and from 1.1 to 0.0% (P = 0.090). Other, there was no statistical difference with respect to the T-retrieved ova (total retrieved ova), high quality embryos, cultured blastocyst and blastocyst number in high responders. For normal responders and poor ovary responders, T-Gn, Gn days, T-retrieved ova, high quality embryos, cultured blastocyst and blastocysts number in oral medications group all apparently decreased. Clinical pregnancy rate per fresh cycle of poor responders with prior oral medications was significantly decreased (25.7% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.005), and no significant differences in high responders and normal responders were expressed (52.5% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.310; 51.9% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.163) between two groups of participants. The numbers of cumulative pregnancy rates were lower in the conventional group compared to the add group for high (75.90% versus 81.03%, P = 0.279), normal (62.69% versus 71.36%, P = 0.016) and poor (39.74% versus 68.21%, P < 0.001) responders. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of CC/LE to the ovulation induction during IVF has certain efficacy in terms of low cost, low OHSS incidence. CC/LE deserves more recommendations as a responsible strategy in high responders due to advantageous pregnancy outcomes. For normal responders, the strategy needs to be considered with more comprehensive factors.

Safety of Ovaleap® (Follitropin Alfa) in Infertile Women Undergoing Superovulation for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Multinational Comparative, Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Ovaleap® (follitropin alfa), a recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone, is a biosimilar medicinal product to Gonal-f® and is used for ovarian stimulation. The main objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of Ovaleap® compared to Gonal-f® in one treatment cycle in routine clinical practice. Methods: Safety of Ovaleap® Follitropin alfa in Infertile women undergoing superovulation for Assisted reproductive technologies (SOFIA) was a prospective cohort study conducted in six European countries. Eligible patients were infertile women undergoing superovulation for assisted reproductive technology, who were administered Ovaleap® or Gonal-f® for ovarian stimulation and were naïve to follicle stimulating hormone treatment. The recruitment ratio was 1:1. The primary endpoint was incidence proportion of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and the secondary endpoint was OHSS severity (Grades I, II, III). The effect of risk factors or potential confounders on the odds ratio for OHSS incidence as well as treatment effect on OHSS incidence was explored using univariate logistic regression. Pregnancy and live birth rates were also assessed. Results: A total of 408 women who were administered Ovaleap® and 409 women who were administered Gonal-f® were eligible for analysis. The incidence proportion of OHSS was 5.1% (95% CI: 3.4, 7.7) in the Ovaleap® cohort and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9, 5.4) in the Gonal-f® cohort. This difference in OHSS incidence proportion between the two cohorts was not statistically significant neither before (p = 0.159) nor after univariate adjustment for each potential confounder (p > 0.05). The incidence proportion of OHSS severity grades was similar in the two treatment groups (3.4% versus 2.0% for Grade I, 1.2% versus 1.0% for Grade II, and 0.5% versus 0.2% for Grade III, in the Ovaleap® and Gonal-f® cohorts, respectively), without a significant statistical difference (p = 0.865, for each grade). Among patients who had embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rates were 33% and 31% and live birth rates were 27% and 26%, in the two cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Findings from the SOFIA study indicate that the incidence proportions of OHSS and OHSS severity, as well as pregnancy and live birth rates, are similar between Ovaleap® and Gonal-f® treatments and corroborate the safety and effectiveness of Ovaleap® as a biosimilar to Gonal-f®.

Low risk of OHSS with follitropin delta use in women with different polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: To explore the efficacy of follitropin delta in ovarian stimulation of patients with the Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM 2003 phenotypes of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) using a retrospective case series with an electronic file search in a reproductive medicine clinic. CASE PRESENTATION: Seventy-four patients with PCOS undergoing ovarian stimulation according to the individualized dosing algorithm of follitropin delta for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI)/oocyte freezing were included. Follitropin delta resulted in a high number of pre-ovulatory follicles at the end of stimulation as expected in patients with PCOS. There was a large number of oocytes retrieved with an acceptable percentage of metaphase II (MII) oocytes. There were no cases of moderate or severe OHSS across all phenotypes. CONCLUSION: Follitropin delta, using the individualized dosing algorithm, appears to be a safe method of ovarian stimulation with a low risk of OHSS in PCOS patients without sacrificing successful stimulation outcomes.

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome associated with long-acting GnRH agonist in oncofertility patients.

PURPOSE: To report three cases of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) among oncofertility patients receiving a long-acting GnRH agonist for ovarian suppression after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with a GnRH antagonist protocol METHODS: Chart abstraction was completed for three patients at a single academic medical center. Patients included were undergoing fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic chemotherapy. All patients underwent COH with GnRH antagonist protocol and embryo cryopreservation immediately followed by ovarian suppression with long-acting GnRH agonist. Main outcome measure was development of OHSS. RESULTS: Despite using GnRH agonist trigger and freezing all embryos, patients developed ascites, intermittent hyponatremia and hemoconcentration consistent with severe early-onset OHSS after receiving long-acting GnRH agonist immediately following oocyte retrieval for ovarian preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of severe OHSS may be increased when a long-acting GnRH agonist is used for ovarian suppression immediately following oocyte retrieval. A delay in initiating long-acting GnRH agonist after oocyte retrieval in patients at high risk for developing OHSS should be considered.